For the most part I agree with Cynthia Parkhill”s recent column promoting the use of public transit.
Reducing one”s consumption of fossil fuels and carbon footprint are important goals. As a lifelong supporter of progressive politics, I normally am all in favor of environmentalism and protection of the planet.
However, I do take issue with her idea that the private use of autos should be restricted. This is an example of big government paternalism in the name of a worthy goal run amok.
This is the kind of idea that gives the green movement a bad public image. Big Brother (the federal or state government) is going to tell us when we can or cannot drive our cars. I don”t think so. This is definitely one case where we should let market forces do the job.
Rising fuel prices have already forced most people to reduce the amount they drive. Many of us are thinking about buying an electric, hybrid, or plug-in hybrid vehicle (or already have purchased one). I am planning to invest in my own sustainable electric power generating equipment. Many others already have.
People making their own individual decisions to purchase fuel efficient and alternative fuel vehicles are helping to drive the economic recovery.
Individuals who invest in solar and wind power will, as well. It is clear that a government mandate to use our cars less will not.
Lake County is fortunate to have a public transit system for those who can conveniently use it. It is also a great idea to expand public transportation systems where they make economic sense and will benefit society. It would be foolish to undermine such a positive goal by promoting the restriction of our freedom to drive. Don”t kid yourself, the automobile still represents the great American ideal of freedom for most of us.
Tony Riley
Kelseyville
