Question for those well-meaning people who defend the theory of evolution for human origins; which evolved first: the digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat food, the digestive juices or the body”s resistance to its own digestive juices?
DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
The Bible warns us about science falsely so-called.
Charles Darwin had a degree in Theology not Science. He stated “To suppose that the eye could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd to the highest degree.”
Beliefs have consequences. If you are only being allowed to consider one explanation for scientific data when others exist, you are being indoctrinated not educated.
“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” Sir Arthur Keith stated in his forward Origins of Species 100th edition.
The debate is not about the ages of rocks or whether or not you believe a bone you find in the soil did things that living creatures today can not do, such as produce offspring of a different species. It is not about supposed vestigial structures or observable adaptation or variations. The debate is over the validity of four words … In the beginning God.
Stacey Salvadori
Hidden Valley Lake
